Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee

Chairperson Tate called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m.

CBOC Members Present: Martin Cohen, Jill Escher, Dave Ferguson, Liza Ferras, Allen Rice, Al Roosma, C.C. Su, Charles Tate, Greg West.

CBOC Members Absent: Todd Elliot, Dave Fadness, Fred Schorr, Sally Souders.

Board of Education Representatives to the Committee Present: Veronica Lewis, Carol Myers.

Staff (SJUSD) Representatives Present: Joe Aversano, Bruce Collins, John Cimino, Charles Corr, Pat Day, Florence Eng, Jerry Matranga, Pete Pearne, Paul Rische and Ty Williams.

Others Present: Geoff Lightfoot, Doug Williams Turner Construction, Curtis Mathis (Moss-Adams), Gary Rummelhoff (Board Member).

It was moved (Rice) and seconded (Roosma) to adopt the agenda.
Motion passed unanimously.

It was moved (West) and seconded (Su) to approve the minutes of the June 2^nd meeting.
Motion passed unanimously.

Michelle Whitfield (Hammer Parent) presented a petition in favor of specific work at Hammer Elementary.

It was moved (Rice) and seconded (Su) to consider replacing the Implementation Plan Review Criteria document created by the sub-committee with the edited document provided by district staff (Exhibit A).
The motion passed unanimously.
It was moved (Rice) and seconded (West) to adopt the Implementation Plan Review Criteria as edited by district staff subject to revision at a future date.
The motion passed unanimously.

Mr. Corr reviewed the report for Board of Education action on July 1, 2003, recommending that the district move ahead with the design phase of specific projects (Exhibit B). Mr. Corr also explained that the Implementation Plan would not be presented to the Board for approval on July 1^st. The plan is still undergoing significant changes and is not ready for final adoption.Mr. Lightfoot distributed a document (Exhibit C), which is a compilation of questions that have been submitted from community members at the 6 community meetings. The intent is to post this document on the web and provide answers to the questions and to do this on an on-going basis.
Mr. Rische reviewed amendments to the District Technology Plan as a result of the Technology sub-committee’s input.
It was moved (West) and seconded (Roosma) to adopt the priorities put forth in the Implementation Plan for the first two calendar years (2003 and 2004).
The motion failed 2 to 4 with one abstention.
It was moved (Rice) and seconded (Ferguson) to accept 3 reports:

Implementation Plan Update (Exhibit C)
Technology Plan Update (Exhibit D)
Board Item to initiate design phase for specific projects (Exhibit B)

The motion passed unanimously.

It was moved (Roosma) and seconded (West) that the committee concur with the Board Item —‘Authorization to proceed with the design phase of specified Measure F Projects’ (Exhibit B).
The motion passed unanimously.

There were no items under new business.

9.1. Chair Report. It was moved (Roosma) and seconded (West) to table this report until the next meeting.
The motion passed unanimously.

9.2 Expenditure Efficiencies Sub-Committee report. It was moved(Rice) and seconded (Roosma) to defer this report until the next meeting.
The motion passed unanimously.

9.3 Bid Process Review Sub-Committee report. Mr. Su reported as follows:

9.5 Measure F Audit Steering Committee report. Mr. Ferguson reported that Moss-Adams if the firm that will execute the performance audit.
It was moved(Rice) and seconded (Su) to accept the report.
The motion passed unanimously.

9.6 District Staff report. Mr. Matranga presented two items being submitted to the Board on July 1, 2003.

9.7 Other.